Coming into the course I had few
assumptions concerning jazz especially the history behind the music. In regards
to the musicians themselves, I visualized older, black men performing in
low-lit jazz clubs for cigar smoking, wine drinking audience members. While
there are some commonalities between my assumption and reality, I was mistaken
by the fact that there is no atypical jazz musician. Jazz can be played by a
Chicagoan in the heart of the city or by a white man in Mile Davis’s band. Miles
discussed the struggle to break from the popularity of melody and
predictability, and spotlight the diversity of performer and audience creating
a diverse sound filled with life and creative expression.
The birth of jazz had never crossed
my mind before this course. I had known that New Orleans fostered its growth; however,
the breeding of different sounds, styles, and genres that created jazz were
unknown to me. Professor Stewart has taught us that, “jazz is not a style or
genre, but a creative process that had existed in other music.” Jazz grew from
the inter-mixing of different musical genres. Cities such as New Orleans,
Chicago, and New York, African musical tradition, and the contribution of
musically gifted and brave individuals willing to push social and creative
boundaries in the music industry all combined to create jazz. Miles Davis speaks on the struggles he faced
in breaking America’s popularity of rock music and the melody. He expressed how,
“just a few years back the music [they] were playing was the cutting edge, was
getting real popular and finding a wide audience, all that started to stop when
the critics—white critics—started supporting the free thing” (Davis 271). The “free thing…didn’t have no melodic line,
wasn’t lyrical, and you couldn’t hum to it,” artists like Davis struggled to
display the diverse and fluid characteristics of jazz. Jazz was not confined to
rules or fossilized instead improvisation was key and the form was constantly
evolving and changing (Davis 270). The
American audience failed to evolve past melody and embrace improvisation and
evolving art.
Jazz’s connection to social growth,
along with its ties to white and black controversy is another element that I
was unaware of. I largely assumed that white artists did not contribute or
participate in the growth of jazz, however their involvement can be greatly
constituted to stealing and copying from great, black jazz artists. As popularity for jazz grew, many white
artists began to mimic the black sound catching the ear of record companies. This
lead to a nationwide production and release of their recordings. Although black
artists began to lay their songs on records shortly after, it was white
privilege that allowed for white musicians to break these grounds easier and
quicker. Miles expressed his anger
towards, “white people [trying] to take credit for something after they
discover it” (Davis 55). There was a tendency for white artists to copy the
evolving jazz sounds and because of their skin color they would gain greater access
to bigger audiences and media attention grabbing the spotlight.
This class opened my eyes to jazz,
not only as an art form, but as a social and cultural movement. Jazz is not
based on fixed rules and notes, but instead is a living and evolving art that
resurrects freedom to break restrictions and guidelines making each piece
different than the one before. Jazz is
representative of African roots, musicians playing in back room clubs in New
Orleans, Chicago, New York, and the struggles, accomplishments and feelings
that filled the minds and souls of black artists.