Throughout the rise and
popularization of jazz music, racial injustices and segregation had always been
an underlying issue. Breaking grounds
musically, socially, and culturally jazz had become a beacon for a new age in
the black community, gaining its momentum in the 1930’s Swing Age. With the
help of radio and magazines, a large scale market for swing music developed
pushing not only music critics to address racial implications in jazz, but for
society to acknowledge the injustices as well, thus propelling the discussion
of race and jazz into the public light.
A huge market for Swing music
became nationally known and admired throughout the 1930’s and this was in part
due to the radio. The radio allowed jazz music to be heard anywhere. Audiences
no longer had to go to concert halls to hear “hot jazz” and instead could listen
to it in the comfort of their homes. However this growing popularity began to
draw more and more people to live performances and this, “required deference to
the rituals of Jim Crowe segregation which meant black musicians were unable to
play from the front line delivering music to the white audiences” (Stewart
Lecture). This restriction directly displayed the racial injustice in jazz and
sparked discussion and thought that would eventually lead to the push to break
down racial barriers.
With its successful integration
into American Pop Culture, jazz began to receive more attention from music
critics and these critics in turn brought light to the issue of race and
jazz. The most acknowledged critic was
John Hammond. Hammond was the most prevalent writer that looked at the
correlation between race and jazz and was an advocate of racial equality. He
stated, “only by unity between Negroes and whites will they be able to survive
and flourish” (Swing Changes 61). He wanted to bring light to the injustices
against blacks in the music industry and attacked those who hindered his
efforts, such as Duke Ellington. Hammond believed Ellington to be a betrayer of
his race and that he had, “shut his eyes to the abuses being heaped upon his
race and his original class” (Swing Changes 51). Ellington was backing the abandonment of black
culture in favor of white acceptance.
Black artists constantly faced the
issue of respectability. The foundation of jazz music was built in bars and brothels.
To counter this some black artists took on an air of sophistication to put the
whites at ease and further their career; Duke Ellington was known for this
sophistication (Swing Changes 53). This abandoning of black culture perpetuated
white privilege as well as racial indifference and prompted Hammond’s comments.
Hammond’s goal was to break the hegemonic role of the whites and expose the
injustices as well as the creativity and beauty of the black role in jazz
(Stewart Lecture). Some examples of his efforts include his discovery and push
of Fletcher Henderson into Benny Goodman’s band. This racial mixing not only
broke down racial barriers, but led to competition between black and white
musicians in which the music not skin color took president (Swing Changes). The Savoy in Harlem was a music battle
between two of the father’s of swing Benny Goodman and Chick Webb. Thousands of
people from all social, cultural, and economic classes were coming to view both
a black and white artist perform which helped to validate jazz as a genre and
gain respectability for the craft (Stewart Lecture).
The
Swing Era led to the development of a market that popularized the genre
bringing racial barriers and inequalities into light. Due to the determination
of key figures such as John Hammond to ignite the push for equality in society,
the 1930’s was a time of cultural and musical change that revolutionized the
music and the message. The direct attack
on racism in the 1930s came about through the discussion of racial injustice,
which in turn changed to action. Swing not only brought about a musical
revolution but gave way to a racial revolution as well.